McFarlane Mechanical Contractors has experts available to help with all of your Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning needs.

Technical vs. Process Commissioning

Commissioning has become an accepted and necessary part of the construction process especially in the mechanical contracting field. The word "commissioning" is used in everyday discussions by owners and engineers without a real understanding of the processes involved.

ASHRAE has defined Commissioning as the following commissioning is the process of ensuring that systems are designed, installed, functionally tested, and capable of being operated and maintained to perform in conformity with the design intent. This definition goes a long way towards defining the intent of the commission process. Two methods of commissioning have evolved; Process Commissioning and Technical commissioning.

Process Commissioning is a method of commissioning that concentrates on ensuring that documentation has been completed to show various aspects of the construction process have been tested and verified to be working by the installing contractor. The process commissioning agent will assemble design review reports from the engineer that shows how the engineer addressed the owner's project requirements. This type of commissioning collects all the Field Tests performed by the various mechanical contracting trades that show all equipment, pipe, duct, controls and accessories were installed as specified.

Similar start startup reports completed by the contractors showing all equipment was started and run in accordance with the manufacturer's requirements are also collected. Control checkout and Test and Balance (TAB) contractor's reports are reviewed for accuracy.

Operations & Maintenance manuals and training are reviewed for conformance to the specification requirements. Random room sampling may be done to verify that systems are controlling properly. 'It is not necessary for the process commissioning agent to have detailed technical knowledge of the project. Process Cx relies on the technical expertise of others to verify system operation. The Process Commissioner's area of expertise is the commissioning process itself. A final report with all the above data will be assembled and presented to the owner as proof that the specifications were followed. The Commissioning agent will state "Here is the report to prove that the project was commissioned. Our Process Commissioning has been complete."

Technical Commissioning is hands-on method where the Commissioning Agent is actively involved in all phases of the project. The technical commissioning agent must have a through understanding of the engineering principles involved in the project design, detailed knowledge of the construction methods used in building the system and an intimate understanding of system controls and of the Test and Balance Process. Technical Commissioning is a process that has been developed and promoted by the National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB)

Because the Technical commissioning agent is working for the owner to ensure that the project is designed and constructed to operate in accordance with the owners project requirements, this is a professional service and should be contracted directly with the owner. The technical commissioning agent provides the most benefit to the owner by being involved in the initial stage of the design process. Design decisions that affect cost and operation are made during the early design stages and the past experience of the technical commissioning agent is invaluable in helping keep design decisions on task.

The technical commissioner also ensures that the proper contract language, forms, commissioning plan and outline of commissioning related work are placed in the contract documents. This is done to help the contractors understand their responsibilities in the technical commissioning process and also to place the responsibility for the proper implementation of the commissioning process onto the mechanical contracting firms.

During the Construction phase of the project, the differences between the Process and Technical commissioning become more apparent. While the Process Commissioner reviews the construction commissioning forms completed by the contractors, the technical commissioning agent is involved in periodic site inspections to actually observe and review the installation and startup methods to ensure that the contractor's reports are being completed in the proper manner and systems are operating properly.

The technical commissioning process becomes more labor intensive in the final phases of the construction process. While the Process Commissioner may or may not review the final TAB report, the technical commissioning agent will monitor and observe the set up procedures that are used by the TAB contractor. The process used to setup the initial air handler and terminal uni ts are observed lo ensure the TAB contractor actually understands the implementation of proper TAB procedures. When the final TAB report is completed, the technical commissioner will verify all readings to ensure the system is balanced properly.

The Process Commissioner may or may not review the control testing and setup procedures. The technical commissioning agent will perform a point to point check out on 100% of all loops to verify that each sensor and loop is communicating with the proper devices, will verify that control components are installed, operating and calibrated properly.

Once the controls and TAB testing is complete and systems are physically observed and verified for proper operation, Functional Performance Tests (FPT) are conducted on 100% of the systems with the control contractor to conclusively prove the systems operate in the automatic mode and maintain system set-point within design and prove the system loops are stable. Where the Process Commissioner will randomly sample a small percentage of spaces, the technical commissioner will physically test 100% of all loops to verify that each loop functions properly and is stable. This is accomplished by physically changing a set-point and trending the control response over time. This trend graph of actual measured conditions over time compared with set points is visible proof that the systems work as intended.

For example, a space thermostat may be adjusted from 75F to 72F, the trend graph will show how the room temperature responds to this change and will either prove or disprove that the room thermostat loop controls the space temperature to the owner's project requirements. The project is not complete until all loops are proven to be working as intended and all data is assembled and given to the owner as the final Commissioning Report.

When completed, the firm can look the owner in the eye and state, "Here is our report. We have personally tested every single loop and observed the operation of every single component. We have graphs to show that each loop performs as required. We guarantee your building will work as intended because we were the people that performed the final testing."